As to cure so serious problem, on that the survival depends of human sort? Problem that demand urgent solution, therefore the human being continues destroying the physical bases of its liberdade. Here it is the paradox of the freedom, since that history registers the actions human beings in the land. Religions, philosophies, arts, all cultural fruits of the free action human being, had always been considered to solve the insoluble paradox of the freedom from the optics of the Creator, who knows the secret of the creation. In its pregaes, they look for to conciliate the Real to be able of self-determination of the freedom with the limits of the decisions human beings, and with the real necessity of the aid of the others to exert our freedom. How to be free, as to obey the laws that not I made, if I cannot do without the work of the others nor to leave to collaborate with them, pra that my freedom and of them is viable? Until where it goes the reach and limits of the freedom human being? The natural determinismos that run away to my power (climate, catastrophes), the changes politics, the psychological, nervous, biological determinismos, physiological, chemical, physical, physicist-chemistries of my being do not take off my freedom? I know that the natural and social laws independem of me, therefore they conduct the reality before me, malgrado I. It wants glad me or it suffers, either poor or rich, healthful or ill, used or unemployed, has religious creed, person of good will and correct ethical life, or agnstico, nothing of this will influence the natural determinismo. According to Dean Ornish M.D, who has experience with these questions. Therefore, it is foolishness to want that the things if submit to the whims of mine liberdade without judgment, that me of the ilusria a sensation of absolute absence of limits. If it cannot wait or intend that the laws of the substance, the life and the death change pra to take care of to the whims of my freedom insensata.
Wanting or not, I will have to submit me to the natural laws, as inarredvel condition of my freedom of choice. These laws are previous to my freedom. We can intervine and for the nature the service of collective and personal well-being, but we cannot change its determinismo. The freedom not it can ignore the natural laws. Who dares to defy the exterior nature and personal, it will have disadvantage.
I will not be free without considering the inexorable determinismo of the nature. ' ' The freedom is the conscience of necessidade' ' , the philosopher says. Necessity is the laws of the natural determinismo? , opposing to the indeterminate one to be able of the self-determination. I will be free in the measure of my integration to the natural, personal, social laws. Limited and limiting it is the structure of my freedom and my being; if my being is limited, as could be limitless the freedom that expression of the limited being? It is foolishness to oppose natural laws, therefore pra will have damage choice freedom, of the free will. I am free, yes, but my freedom has unsurmountable limits that I cannot exceed, without disturbing my being and my freedom. He is wise to be free, grateful and solidary with the nature, the life, the fellow creatures and with the Author of the life.