Another sufficiently interesting question of if observing in the answers of the interviewed ones were when asking ' ' where we can find the culture? ' ' the interviewed answers of the two first ones had been the same one: ' ' where to inhabit life human being, cultura&#039 meets; ' , differentiating itself of the third person, who to the being inquired on the question answers: ' ' in one school! I find that in house nobody has culture not, in house you I feel the will, I I find that only the rich ones have these frescuras' '. That is, the consequence of a thought of the ruling classes is perceived clearly, when affirming that who only has one determined purchasing power is who has culture, as Laraia cites: ' ' In a Country as ours, where forms hierarquizantes of classification cultural always had been dominant, where the elite always was made use the auto one to chastise itself saying that we do not have a culture, nothing more healthful of what this antropolgico exercise to discover that the negative form – this to say that we do not have culture is, paradoxicalally, a way to act cultural ' ' (Laraia? 2001) Still analyzing the interview, the culture of them was asked to interviewed the which age, where the first person answered: ' ' I believe exactly that I have typically occidental cultural aspects, however adapted the regional aspects that differ in them from the others, that let us belong pas&#039 the same; '. Already the second person, says that ' ' my culture she is the northeastern, what I will have northeast I approve! ' ' as that it disapproved what does not belong to the culture of it, in a etnocntrica vision to see the culture. Already the third interviewed person, remained with a thought of inferiority regarding its proper culture, that answered: ' ' My culture? What I find myself? I do not find that I have culture not! Cult is who knows to eat of yoke and knife, I already tried, but not inenche the belly not! taste not to use those high shoes not! It is interesting to analyze the different cultures, observing similarities and differences, but having always a vision to compare or to understand the behavior of the different existing communities and not to observe by means of the etnocentrismo, wanting to show to this or that culture as being best.